Provider Comparison

Shortlist up to three providers, then recommend the one that best fits the Value Case.

Provider economics

Implementation cost, annual fees, revenue share, and fit score for each approved provider.

  • Qualified Payments Partner 01

    Recommended

    End-to-end debit program with integrated rewards.

    Implementation
    $350K
    Annual cost
    $450K
    Revenue share
    0.40%
    Rewards
    0.25% grocer-funded
    Enrolment
    28%
    Timeline
    6–9 mo
    Complexity
    Medium
    Fit
    86/100
  • Qualified Payments Partner 01

    Bank-issued card with provider-funded rewards.

    Implementation
    $100K
    Annual cost
    $250K
    Revenue share
    0.20%
    Rewards
    Provider-funded
    Enrolment
    20%
    Timeline
    4–6 mo
    Complexity
    Low
    Fit
    74/100
  • Qualified Payments Partner 01

    Custom-branded debit with maximum revenue share.

    Implementation
    $500K
    Annual cost
    $650K
    Revenue share
    0.55%
    Rewards
    0.50% grocer-funded
    Enrolment
    32%
    Timeline
    9–12 mo
    Complexity
    High
    Fit
    78/100

Showing 3 of 3 approved providers

2 shortlisted · 1 recommended

Provider details

Requirements and provider-specific risks for each option.

Qualified Payments Partner 01
End-to-end debit program with integrated rewards.
Requirements
  • Loyalty CRM integration
  • In-store enrolment kiosks
  • Card issuance vendor
Provider-specific risks
  • Longer launch than issuer-led
  • Requires marketing co-investment
Qualified Payments Partner 01
Bank-issued card with provider-funded rewards.
Requirements
  • Co-brand agreement
  • Marketing placements
Provider-specific risks
  • Lower economic upside
  • Bank controls customer relationship
Qualified Payments Partner 01
Custom-branded debit with maximum revenue share.
Requirements
  • POS certification
  • Compliance program
  • In-house support
Provider-specific risks
  • Highest implementation cost
  • Longest time to market